An intelligent Anthroposaur is the better term than "dinosauroid", as it is more descriptive.

Dinosaurs are not just one species like man but a vast group of creatures which lived for millions of years - the modern equivalent is the whole of the mammals. Like the mammals only one dinosaur was likely to achieve intelligence. Just as remains of the intelligent mammal are scarce, one can expect the remains of the intelligent dinosaur to be scarce. Gribbon and Cherfas assure us:

The chances of finding fossils of an evolutionary variation that lasts only a few tens of thousands of years are slim.

Writer, Brad Steiger, in his book, Worlds Before Our Own, develops the theme of the cataclysmic seven worlds legends of the Seneca indians. Much of his research supports the thesis of intelligent dinosaurs. The anthroposaurs might have been one of the seven worlds!

Discussing the question of what would remain after an advanced civilization had been destroyed, he compares our own culture and technology with that of an ancient civilization. If a catastrophe were to happen to us now, he asks, what would remain for archaeologists to unearth 15,000 years from now?

He answers:

We are builders in wood and metal. Our most majestic stone buildings are little more than facades supported by thin tendons of steel. In a thousand years, even without flood, fire or nuclear warfare, our major cities would be little more than rubble... But if we were to enter another ice age and enormous glaciers should creep down from the north, as they have several times in the past million years, everything in their inexorable path would be pulverized.

Perhaps Velikovsky is correct when he writes, "Prior civilizations are buried so deeply within the lower strata of the earth that we simply do not have any archaeological evidence of their existence."

The tall "Woman" with a tail

Let us step back a few years to a particularly interesting case. In 1898 two brothers said to be versed in desert antiquities found the fossilized remains of a female, who was seven and a half feet tall, in the same stratum as fossils of prehistoric camels and an elephant-like creature with four tusks. Fossils of palm trees, ferns and fish were also found. The curious thing about these human remains was that the female had a tail, having several extra vertebrae at the end of her spine. Our turn-of-the-century archaeologists surmised that Death Valley, where the fossils had been found, had once been on the continental shelf of the Pacific Ocean, and the fossilized lady's bones had been laid down at that time. Death Valley, like White Sands, lies in the Rocky mountains which were thrust up in a series of gigantic pulses through the Mesozoic and early Cenozoic eras, the very time when the earth was roamed by dinosaurs - until their extinction marked the boundary between the two geological ages.

Could the large female with the tail be the best described specimen yet found of the man-like super-dinosaurs?

The Saurian Race

Excerpt from www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=852

Contrary to popular belief, it was not an asteroid that killed the dinosaurs. It was a supernova, 880 light-years away ((Astronomical Journal, v.77, pp.210-214 (April 1972)). The dinosaurs show evidence of a lot of radiation.

The minumum size to cause a mass extinction at that distance is 26 solar masses. Even if it had been 200 solar masses (that's how big the largest known star is), any dinosaur under 18 feet of rock at the time would have survived.

OK, what's my point?

The velociraptors were as smart as chimpanzees are today. It was only five million years from chimpanzees to humans.

The last few million years of the Cretaceous showed a marked reduction in diversity of dinosaur species: the earlier vigorous adaptive radiation of the hadrosaurs and the ceratopsians similarly gave way to a yielding of variety. For the last two million years of the Cretaceous, a single genus of each- saurolophus and triceratops respectively - dominated the landscape, although they did so in vast numbers.

No gradual environmental change is going to eliminate genetic variation in genus after genus of dinosaurs. That very variation will guarantee adaptation to the changes by natural selection before genetic variation has been significantly pruned. The motive power of evolution is expansion of diversity with environmental change. The dinosaurs' loss of variety is much more characteristic of the loss of variety in species we are seeing today- by unnatural selection- at the hand of man.

Caches of bones of a single species are regarded by paleoanthropologists as suggesting husbandry. In the development of man, various cultures seemed to concentrate on ibex, horses, reindeer and so on. Could it be that ceratopsians and hadrosaurs were actually domestic animals like cows and sheep kept for food?

If so, it is unmistakable evidence of intelligence.

Yes, but what does this have to do with UFOs?

Some of the "aliens" could actually be subterrestrial descendants of the anthroposaurs.

In Search of: The Saurian Race.
The Dinosaur Heritage and the Extinction of Man
www.askwhy.co.uk/books/wholiessleeping.htm

Is it possible that the dinosaurs developed intelligence and destroyed themselves just as present day humans seem to be doing? The author examines the evidence in detail and shows that the dinosaurs gave every indication of being ready to become intelligent. Some species of dinosaur somewhere had all the attributes considered necessary for intelligence in the intelligent mammal. The latter has used its gift to begin the destruction of the world within 200 years of inventing technology. If the intelligent dinosaur had done the same, all that would remain of it in the fossil record would be an oily smear, polluted with heavy metals and exotic compounds. That is just what we find when the dinosaurs died.

Perhaps we are doomed to self extinction like the anthroposaurs because we have inherited some self destructive traits from them. We attempt an initial diagnosis of the dinosaur heritage in human psychology.

Why are we constantly interested in monsters like dinosaurs? Are the squamous anthropoids that preceded us lying sleeping, awaiting their opportunity to retrieve the world they lost? A subliminal awareness of this might explain our obsession with monsters.

TAL: "Maybe the Reptoids do want the / their planet back."

The "Nordics," sometimes seemingly the "enemies" of the gray and reptoid types, are often reported as working side-by-side with them in the underground facilities or labs, which recalls the fact that the some nagas were said to look "almost human," as well as the mercurial dispositions of the aristocratic or "Aryan" faeries, the light elves/de Danaan. Additionally, the apocryphal hybrid offspring of Nefilim and humans were described as having an extremely "nordic" or Aryan appearance, as described in The Book of Lamech, and the Slavonic Book of Enoch, and were also said to have a Reptilian patch of skin ("badge of priesthood") on their chests or elsewhere.

The Reptoids are familiar, as nagas, utukku, ammut, "dragon kings," goblins, trolls, and so on.

Note: A select few have seen this for themselves, but Purple Crow has this "badge of priesthood" in two locations on his body. He is very private about this usually and rarely shows anyone his "Reptoid ID".

Links:

www.adelphiasophism.com/awwls

Anthroposaurus Sapiens http://web.ukonline.co.uk/michael.magee/awwls/00/wls143.html

www.askwhy.co.uk/analogiesandconjectures/stnikosj.html

"The greatest intelligence is precisely the one that suffers most from its own limitations."